Services

Condition Assessments

Know what is failing now, what will fail next year, and what can wait — with condition ratings and photos your board and insurers can act on.

Facilities teams are asked to maintain more assets with flat budgets. Without structured condition data, maintenance becomes reactive — fixing what broke last week instead of what will fail next quarter.

Leadership and insurers increasingly want evidence, not assumptions. A spreadsheet of last year's repair invoices does not tell you which roof, plant item, or building element needs capital funding now.

The problem

You cannot prioritise what you have not properly assessed

Condition blind spots lead to emergency spend, failed inspections, and capital plans nobody trusts.

  • Reactive maintenance draining your budget

    Without condition baselines, teams firefight breakdowns instead of scheduling planned works. Emergency call-outs cost more and disrupt operations.

  • Capital requests rejected for lack of evidence

    Boards and committees want photos, ratings, and risk context — not a verbal estimate that something 'looks old'. Requests without documentation get deferred.

  • Inconsistent assessments across sites

    Different contractors use different scales and standards. Portfolio-level reporting becomes impossible when Site A's 'fair' is Site B's 'poor'.

  • Insurance and compliance asking questions you cannot answer

    Insurers and regulators want documented condition evidence. Assumptions and outdated photos from five years ago are no longer enough.

Our approach

Structured assessments with ratings your whole organisation can use

We apply consistent condition scales, capture photographic evidence on site, and deliver reports formatted for facilities, finance, and leadership.

Asset Counts condition assessments follow agreed rating scales applied uniformly across every asset and site in scope. Each item receives a structured rating, defect notes, maintenance priority, and photographic evidence.

Reports are designed for action — not just documentation. Facilities teams get prioritised defect lists. Finance and asset managers get portfolio summaries for capital planning. Insurers and auditors get evidence they can review without chasing follow-up.

We can assess building elements, plant and equipment, infrastructure, and external assets — standalone or as part of a broader register and inspection program.

What you receive

  • Structured condition ratings using agreed scales
  • Photographic evidence for every assessed asset or element
  • Defect descriptions with maintenance priority rankings
  • Site-level and portfolio-level condition summaries
  • Reports formatted for facilities, finance, and committee review
  • Data exports compatible with asset management and CMMS systems

What changes for your team

Maintenance plans backed by evidence

Prioritise spend on assets and elements that genuinely need attention — not whoever complained loudest.

Capital works submissions that get approved

Condition ratings, photos, and risk context give boards and committees a clear basis for funding decisions.

Portfolio-wide visibility

Consistent standards across sites mean you can compare condition and risk at scale for the first time.

Our approach

How we work with you

We scope assessment criteria, rating scales, and reporting formats with you before site work begins — so deliverables match how your team actually works.

Scope your requirements

We review your sites, registers, inspection needs, and objectives to define scope, standards, and timelines.

Inspect & capture on site

Our teams assess, verify, map, and document assets and property elements with consistent standards at every location.

Deliver clear reports

You receive registers, inspection reports, valuations, and compliance documentation ready for insurers, committees, and leadership.

Get a condition baseline you can plan from

Share your sites and asset types — we will propose an assessment program with clear deliverables.

Start an enquiry

Related services